Tuesday, May 5, 2015

6.7 Research: Automatic Take Off and Laning


The Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk is a high altitude long endurance (HALE) Intelligence Reconnaissance Surveillance (ISR) unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that was designed as a potential replacement to the manned version; the U-2 Dragon Lady.  The RQ-4 flies at an altitude of approximately 60,000 feet for more than 32 hours at about 340 knots (Quick, 2009).  The newest version block 40 is equipped with a more advanced Multi-Platform Radar Technology insertion Program (MP-RTIP) that permits almost all weather, day or night fully autonomous UAV (Keller, 2012).  The original design of this system was to have it operate completely automated throughout all phases (start, taxi, takeoff, enroute, landing, taxi and shutdown) of its flight via the automation software.  However following its inception into the Air Forces inventory, the ability to manipulate the flight plan was added.  A typical RQ-4 flight consists of two major elements; the Launch Recovery Element (LRE) and the Mission Control Element (MCE) teams ("Rq-4 global hawk," ).  Both of these teams consist of fully trained and qualified RQ-4 pilots that must maintain currencies on annual bases, similar to pilots of manned aircraft.  The purpose of the LRE is to assist during the start, taxi, takeoff and landing phases of flight, while the MCE is in charge of piloting the aircraft ("Rq-4 global hawk," ).  Since the RQ-4 is designed to be completely automated, it does not have the traditional manual mode.  Rather any alterations required to the flight path are accomplished through the computer software controlled by the MCE (Quick, 2009).  During the takeoff and landing phase, the LRE team monitors the flight path and works with the MCE to as needed.  Although the route can be altered in flight, this is not normally practiced as it will alter the sensors targeting priorities.  The landing gear is retracted automatically once passed 400 feet and again extended automatically upon approach.  In the event the aircraft loses link, is unresponsive or becomes a possible hazard, the MCE crew is capable of initiating a self-destruct command.  Once initiated by the flight crew, the system will confirm this command then execute a vertical stall to pancake into the terrain at approximately the same location as it was initiated.  With the inability to manipulated the aircraft by conventional means (sick, pedals and throttles), pilots are limited in their ability to control the aircraft in a timely manner during the critical phases of flight.  This can potentially lead to a safety incident or accident.  This also becomes a bigger factor as the RQ-4 is further integrated within the evolving National Airspace System.  My recommendation is to modify the MCE ground control station and aircraft software to permit a more tactile control. 

In regards to automated takeoff and landing systems on manned aircraft the most common systems available exist on commercial aircraft.  In fact most of the aircraft flying today by the airlines is fully automated.  However for the purpose of this discussion, the Boeing-777 (B-777) automated system will be discussed.  The B-777 is capable of landing in zero feet visibility and zero feet cloud deck height safely while on autopilot; however the minimum altitude in which the aircraft will be flown in bad weather may vary and in most cases is restricted to 200 feet or higher (Lim, 2008).  The success of this system is made possible do the auto pilot software (autopilot and flight director system) combined with additional onboard sensors and global positioning satellites (GPS) that give a constant update to the current location, altitude, airspeed, etc.  Although the landing phase is automated, the pilot is still required to intervene in order to reduce speeds as the flaps are selected (Lim, 2008).  As the aircraft approached the threshold of the runway, the automatic system will transition the aircraft to a landing position (flare), calling out the altitude every 10 feet and finally at 25 feet above the ground will retard the throttles to the aft or min position (Lim, 2008).  Once on the ground and slowing the automated system will initiate the auto brakes combined with the pilot’s use of the reverse thrusters as needed.  This aircraft is also capable of an automated takeoff in which the aircraft will adjust the throttles to optimal limits, rotate the aircraft at the appropriate rotational speed and retract the gear once airborne and clear of the runway environment.  Ultimately pilots are responsible for the constant monitoring of the aircrafts system and instruments and if needed (from system failure, not operating as intended, etc.) the pilot will execute an “auto-pilot disengage switch” then manually fly the aircraft.  Training in using this system is maintained as part of the pilot’s annual proficiency.  In regards to safety, recent studies have shown that the transition from actively flying to monitoring of aircraft systems have caused a deficiency in flying skills.  This is can lead to a dangerous situation during the critical phases of flight ("Routine hands-on procedures," 2014).  In addition, the constant monotony in monitoring of systems has shown to increase the likelihood of pilot fatigue.  A perfect example of this was in the 2013 Asian Airlines accident in which the pilot was unable to hand-fly the B-777 for a landing.  My recommendation is that all pilots are required to fly so many takeoffs and landings per month manually and that all evaluations check-rides are performed manually. 

Reference:
Keller, J. (2012, March 08). Northrop Grumman and Raytheon to demonstrate MP-RTIP radar system on global hawk block 40 UAV. Retrieved from http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/2012/03/northrop-grumman-and-raytheon-to-demonstrate-mp-rtip-radar-system-on-global-hawk-block-40-uav.html
Lim. (2008, January 07). Executing a auto landing in a real Boeing 777 as compared to one is a fs 2002.. Retrieved from http://www.askcaptainlim.com/-flight-simulator-pilot-46/636-executing-a-auto-landing-in-a-real-boeing-777-as-compared-to-one-in-a-fs-2002.html
Quick, D. (2009, December 10). Next-gen global hawk hale UAS completes its first flight. Retrieved from http://www.gizmag.com/block-40-global-hawk-flight/13572/
Rq-4 global hawk. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.military.com/equipment/rq-4-global-hawk

Routine hands-on procedures will make flights safer. (2014, January 14). Daily Press. Retrieved from http://articles.dailypress.com/2014-01-14/news/dp-nws-oped-loh-0115-20140114_1_pilot-fatigue-new-pilots-airline-pilots

No comments:

Post a Comment